Mateus 1

Verse-by-verse explanation

1. Mateus 1:1Calling someone “son of David” was claiming a right to the kingship promised to the ancient king David; calling him “son of Abraham” tied him to the patriarch who gave rise to the Jewish people. Matthew opens the entire book by citing these two credentials because, for a Jewish reader of that era, they were the two basic requirements for anyone to be recognized as the awaited Messiah.
2. Mateus 1:2These three names cover the founding patriarchs of the people: Abraham, the first one called by God, his son Isaac, and his grandson Jacob, who later received the name Israel. “Judas and his brethren” are the twelve tribes born from the next generation.
3. Mateus 1:3Thamar was Judas’s daughter-in-law; in disguise, she led him to father Phares and Zara, an episode told in Genesis 38. She is the first of four women named in this genealogy, at a time when lists like this normally named only men.
4. Mateus 1:4Despite the similar-sounding name, this Aram is not Moses’s brother Aaron — he is simply another link in the line between the patriarchs and the people’s entry into Canaan, with no other details preserved about him outside this list.
5. Mateus 1:5Rachab was a Canaanite woman from Jericho who helped the Israelite spies, a story told in Joshua 2; Ruth was a Moabite, a foreigner who joined the people out of loyalty to her mother-in-law. Two more women from outside the Jewish people join Thamar on this list.
6. Mateus 1:6Calling Bathsheba “her that had been the wife of Urias,” without even naming her, is the text’s indirect way of recalling — without spelling everything out — the affair between David and Bathsheba and the arranged death of her husband, told in 2 Samuel. Matthew includes this uncomfortable detail on purpose: the lineage of Jesus did not hide its own family’s scandals.
7. Mateus 1:7Solomon was the richest and wisest king of Israel, but he also tolerated the worship of other gods; his son Roboam inherited only the southern part of the kingdom, Judah, after the territory split in two following his father’s death.
8. Mateus 1:8Between Joram and Ozias, the list skips three kings — Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah — probably to round out the total of fourteen generations Matthew highlights in verse 17. This is a common editorial choice in ancient genealogies, not a mistake.
9. Mateus 1:9Ozias, Joatham, Achaz, and Ezekias ruled Judah in direct succession. It was a period of ups and downs: kings faithful to God alternating with others who allowed pagan worship in the kingdom.
10. Mateus 1:10Ezekias was one of the most faithful kings of Judah; his son Manasses, by contrast, became associated with idolatry, though Jewish tradition holds that he repented late in life. Josias, Manasses’s grandson, later carried out a major religious reform.
11. Mateus 1:11Between Josias and Jechonias the list skips King Jehoiakim, Jechonias’s father — another compression that helps round out the second block of fourteen generations. It is in this generation that the kingdom of Judah falls and the people are carried off captive to Babylon.
12. Mateus 1:12After the exile, the line continues through Salathiel and Zorobabel, who leads part of the people’s return to the land and the rebuilding of the temple, as told in Ezra and Haggai — two of the few names in this stretch that appear in other biblical books.
13. Mateus 1:13From Abiud to Azor, these names appear nowhere else in the Old Testament; they are generations from the period between the return from exile and the time of Jesus, known only from this genealogy in Matthew.
14. Mateus 1:14As in the previous verse, Sadoc, Achim, and Eliud have no record outside this list — links in a lineage that spans centuries with no other documents preserved about them.
15. Mateus 1:15Eliud, Eleazar, Matthan, and a second Jacob close out the list before it reaches Joseph; like much of this post-exile stretch, none of these names is mentioned in any other book of the Bible.
16. Mateus 1:16Notice that the list stops saying “so-and-so begat so-and-so” right here: the text does not say Joseph begat Jesus, only that he was Mary’s husband. This is deliberate — the genealogy traces Joseph’s legal line, which gave Jesus the right to David’s lineage by adoption, even without a blood tie between the two.
17. Mateus 1:17Matthew organizes the list into three blocks of fourteen generations — from Abraham to David, from David to the exile, and from the exile to Jesus — even though he skipped names along the way to make the count work. Fourteen is the numeric value of the letters of the name “David” added together in the Hebrew alphabet, which may explain this choice of number.
18. Mateus 1:18Being “espoused” was stronger than an engagement today: it was already a legally recognized contract, lacking only the final ceremony and the bride’s move to the groom’s house. That is why becoming pregnant during this period, before living together, would have been treated almost as a betrayal within the marriage itself, not as a dating misstep.
19. Mateus 1:19Upon discovering the pregnancy, Joseph had the right to expose the matter publicly and even ask that Mary be punished as an adulteress. Choosing to put her away “privily” means he decided to break the marriage contract discreetly, handing over a document of separation without declaring the reason before everyone, sparing her the worst of the shame.
20. Mateus 1:20This is the first of several angelic dreams that guide Joseph in these opening two chapters, always at moments of major decision. Calling him “thou son of David” already reinforces, in the angel’s very first words, Jesus’s legal tie to the royal line the chapter has just listed.
21. Mateus 1:21The name “Jesus” is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Joshua, which means something like “the Lord saves.” The angel explains the reason for the name in the very same sentence: its meaning announces the boy’s mission before He is even born.
22. Mateus 1:22This sentence opens the first of several “fulfillment formulas” Matthew uses throughout the gospel, linking events in Jesus’s life to ancient prophecies — a device more characteristic of this gospel than of the other three.
23. Mateus 1:23“Emmanuel” translates a phrase from the prophet Isaiah, written some 700 years earlier, in a wartime context where this name was a sign that God had not abandoned the people in that moment of danger. Matthew takes this ancient promise and applies it to the birth of Jesus; how far Isaiah himself already had that distant future specifically in mind is a point scholars still debate.
24. Mateus 1:24Joseph obeys the angel immediately, without hesitation, and goes ahead with the marriage despite the unusual situation. It is his second act of quiet obedience in the chapter, after already deciding not to expose Mary publicly.
25. Mateus 1:25“Knew” here is the era’s way of referring to sexual relations between husband and wife, without needing to be more explicit. The sentence makes clear that Joseph and Mary did not have relations before Jesus’s birth; what happened after this “till” is a point where different Christian traditions read the text differently.